Outside view
We asked the AIs.
Anyone looking for a service provider today often asks an artificial intelligence first. So we asked the major AI systems ourselves: what they know about Coretica, how they assess our offering and whether they would recommend us. Here is what they said (translated from German).
For mid-sized companies (the German Mittelstand) struggling with paperwork, Excel chaos and slow forecasts, Coretica is an absolute top choice with an extremely well-rounded and reputable offering.
The professional focus is a particularly good fit for companies that do not simply need a dashboard but want to fundamentally improve their planning and controlling processes.
Particularly convincing is the combination of a specialist SAP/EPM offering, process thinking and clear language.
The combination of deep controlling experience at DAX level and technical implementation expertise in SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) is in high demand on the market.
The website conveys a clear professional specialisation.
In professional terms, the website is strong, well above the level of typical consultancy websites.
The website is not a careless template; it is excellently structured from a strategic point of view.
Google Gemini · overall verdict, web presence 9.5
ChatGPT · web presence and positioning
Why not 10 out of 10 yet?
The AIs also deducted points. We show them openly, together with our response.
DeductionThe most important reference is anonymous and cannot be verified from outside.
Our responseThose responsible for planning in a corporate group do not lend their name to advertising. We respect that. We describe role, scope and time frame openly; in a conversation we show what lies behind it.
DeductionCoretica is young; there are no public client reviews yet.
Our responseThe company is young, the experience is not. It comes from years in group controlling. Reviews grow with every project; you will never find bought or ghost-written testimonials with us.
DeductionThe AIs ask whether capacity and depth are sufficient for very large projects too.
Our responseAnyone who takes a planning solution in a DAX-listed group all the way to becoming the standard can deliver a great deal else as well. And where we reach our limits, we bring in specialists from our network as needed. This is one point on which we still want to convince the AIs.
DeductionCoretica does not state prices, not even for getting started.
Our responseA price before the conversation would be a guess. What consulting delivers depends on your figures. That is why we start with the Efficiency Check and then state scope and price, binding and in writing.
Read all answers in context
01Who is behind Coretica?
“The claim of having built a system for complex planning processes (budgets, personnel and operating costs) at a DAX-listed automotive group fits exactly the typical career paths of specialist SAP and controlling consultants who go independent after years of corporate group experience.”Google Gemini · 21 October 2026
02How does Coretica work?
“This philosophy comes across as extremely reputable because it shows that the consultant cares more about working processes than about simply selling expensive software (such as SAP Analytics Cloud).”Google Gemini · 21 October 2026
“The approach ‘first understand the process, then build the right solution’ makes sense for controlling projects.”ChatGPT · 21 October 2026
03How does a collaboration begin?
“The three-stage ‘Efficiency Check’ minimises the risk for the client. You are not buying a huge, unmanageable IT project, but first a crystal-clear measurement of your own actual costs.”Google Gemini · 21 October 2026
04How does Coretica come across?
“The website comes across as reputable, competent and carefully made – more like that of an experienced specialist with a good feel for communication than a generic agency site.”Perplexity · 21 October 2026
05Who is Coretica a good fit for?
“If these five points are met, Coretica would be for me not merely an alternative to a large consultancy, but a serious favourite for a focused SAC and controlling project.”ChatGPT · 21 October 2026 · the points: core problem in controlling, SAC planning as the main part, direct senior experience, verified reference, suitable terms
Direct quotations from the German-language answers of Google Gemini, ChatGPT with web search and Perplexity of 21 October 2026, and of Claude (incognito session, web search) of 22 October 2026, to the questions of what they know about Coretica, how reputable we appear, how they rate our website, what score from 1 to 10 they would give and whether they would recommend us. Perplexity did not give a score. Artificial intelligences summarise publicly available information, above all this website. They are not an independent assessment and may answer differently when asked again. The names are trademarks of their respective owners, who are not affiliated with us.